Search for: All records

The formulation of active pharmaceutical ingredients involves discovering stable crystal packing arrangements or polymorphs, each of which has distinct pharmaceutically relevant properties. Traditional experimental screening techniques utilizing various conditions are commonly supplemented with in silico crystal structure prediction (CSP) to inform the crystallization process and mitigate risk. Predictions are often based on advanced classical force fields or quantum mechanical calculations that model the crystal potential energy landscape but do not fully incorporate temperature, pressure, or solution conditions during the search procedure. This study proposes an innovative alchemical path that utilizes an advanced polarizable atomic multipole force field to predict crystal structures based on direct sampling of the NPT ensemble. The use of alchemical (i.e., nonphysical) intermediates, a novel Monte Carlo barostat, and an orthogonal space tempering bias combine to enhance the sampling efficiency of the deposition/sublimation phase transition. The proposed algorithm was applied to 2-((4-(2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl)phenyl)amino)benzoic acid (Cambridge Crystallography Database Centre ID: XAFPAY) as a case study to showcase the algorithm. Each experimentally determined polymorph with one molecule in the asymmetric unit was successfully reproduced via approximately 1000 short 1 ns simulations per space group where each simulation was initiated from random rigid body coordinates and unit cell parameters. Utilizing two threads of a recent Intel CPU (a Xeon Gold 6330 CPU at 2.00 GHz), 1 ns of sampling using the polarizable AMOEBA force field can be acquired in 4 h (equating to more than 300 ns/day using all 112 threads/56 cores of a dual CPU node) within the Force Field X software (https://ffx.biochem.uiowa.edu). These results demonstrate a step forward in the rigorous use of the NPT ensemble during the CSP search process and open the door to future algorithms that incorporate solution conditions using continuum solvation methods. 

During in silico crystal structure prediction of organic molecules, millions of candidate structures are often generated. These candidates must be compared to remove duplicates prior to further analysis ( e.g. optimization with electronic structure methods) and ultimately compared with structures determined experimentally. The agreement of predicted and experimental structures forms the basis of evaluating the results from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) blind assessment of crystal structure prediction, which further motivates the pursuit of rigorous alignments. Evaluating crystal structure packings using coordinate root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) for N molecules (or N asymmetric units) in a reproducible manner requires metrics to describe the shape of the compared molecular clusters to account for alternative approaches used to prioritize selection of molecules. Described here is a flexible algorithm called Progressive Alignment of Crystals ( PAC ) to evaluate crystal packing similarity using coordinate RMSD and introducing the radius of gyration ( R g ) as a metric to quantify the shape of the superimposed clusters. It is shown that the absence of metrics to describe cluster shape adds ambiguity to the results of the CCDC blind assessments because it is not possible to determine whether the superposition algorithm has prioritized tightly packed molecular clusters ( i.e. to minimize R g ) or prioritized reduced RMSD ( i.e. via possibly elongated clusters with relatively larger R g ). For example, it is shown that when the PAC algorithm described here uses single linkage to prioritize molecules for inclusion in the superimposed clusters, the results are nearly identical to those calculated by the widely used program COMPACK . However, the lower R g values obtained by the use of average linkage are favored for molecule prioritization because the resulting RMSDs more equally reflect the importance of packing along each dimension. It is shown that the PAC algorithm is faster than COMPACK when using a single process and its utility for biomolecular crystals is demonstrated. Finally, parallel scaling up to 64 processes in the open-source code Force Field X is presented. 

Force Field X (FFX) is an open-source software package for atomic resolution modeling of genetic variants and organic crystals that leverages advanced potential energy functions and experimental data. FFX currently consists of nine modular packages with novel algorithms that include global optimization via a many-body expansion, acid–base chemistry using polarizable constant-pH molecular dynamics, estimation of free energy differences, generalized Kirkwood implicit solvent models, and many more. Applications of FFX focus on the use and development of a crystal structure prediction pipeline, biomolecular structure refinement against experimental datasets, and estimation of the thermodynamic effects of genetic variants on both proteins and nucleic acids. The use of Parallel Java and OpenMM combines to offer shared memory, message passing, and graphics processing unit parallelization for high performance simulations. Overall, the FFX platform serves as a computational microscope to study systems ranging from organic crystals to solvated biomolecular systems.